What’s a good argument?

The Philosophers' Magazine 51 (51):87-92 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Becoming knowledgeable about good arguments through arguing, through focused involvement and educational progress through stages of deepeningunderstanding, is a logically prior requirement to being able to give a set of criteria or a definition of a good argument. So rather than seek a definition or criteria, we should seek expertise, wisdom regarding what we were tempted to define, through the long, slow and gradually deepening involvement in thinking things through.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Schools of thought.Julian Baggini - 2012 - The Philosophers' Magazine 56 (56):14-17.
What Good Is Ancient Philosophy?Robert Boyd Skipper - 2019 - Philosophy and Literature 43 (2):535-542.
Democracy: What’s It Good For?Robert B. Talisse - 2020 - The Philosophers' Magazine 89:44-49.
Can evolution tell us why we should be good?Michael LaBossiere - 2007 - The Philosophers' Magazine 37:30-30.
What is x-phi good for?David Papineau - 2011 - The Philosophers' Magazine 52 (52):83-88.
Is signal synchrony independent of transport synchrony?Brian Ellis - 1978 - Philosophy of Science 45 (2):309-311.
Knowing what’s good for you.Peter Adamson - 2011 - The Philosophers' Magazine 53 (53):85-90.
The Illusion of the Good.Mourad Wahba - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 44:269-271.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
85 (#248,228)

6 months
9 (#509,115)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references