Proposition II (Book I) of Newton’s Principia

Archive for History of Exact Sciences 63 (2):129-167 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

After preparing the way with comments on evanescent quantities and then Newton’s interpretation of his second law, this study of Proposition II (Book I)— Proposition II Every body that moves in some curved line described in a plane and, by a radius drawn to a point, either unmoving or moving uniformly forward with a rectilinear motion, describes areas around that point proportional to the times, is urged by a centripetal force tending toward that same point. —asks and answers the following questions: When does a version of Proposition II first appear in Newton’s work? What revisions bring that initial version to the final form in the 1726 Principia? What, exactly, does this proposition assert? In particular, what does Newton mean by the motion of a body “urged by a centripetal force”? Does it assert a true mathematical claim? If not, what revision makes it true? Does the demonstration of Proposition II persuade? Is it as convincing, for example, as the most convincing arguments of the Principia? If not, what revisions would make the demonstration more persuasive? What is the importance of Proposition II, to the physics of Book III and the mathematics of Book I?

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Newton's Argument for Proposition 1 of the Principia.Bruce Pourciau - 2003 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 57 (4):267-311.
Proposition 10, Book 2, in the Principia, revisited.Michael Nauenberg - 2011 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 65 (5).
The Importance of Being Equivalent: Newton’s Two Models of One-Body Motion.Bruce Pourciau - 2004 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 58 (4):283-321.
Language, Truth, and the Liar.Kiriake Xerohemona - 2004 - Dissertation, University of Miami

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-03

Downloads
10 (#1,473,491)

6 months
3 (#1,475,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Understanding (in) Newton’s Argument for Universal Gravitation.Steffen Ducheyne - 2009 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 40 (2):227-258.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references