Restricting Police Immunity

Public Affairs Quarterly 32 (4):305-330 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Police use force in high-stakes situations: as state agents, they are obligated to balance the suspect’s right to security against the community members’ right to safety. Currently, the doctrine of qualified immunity (DQI) overprotects police officers, which facilitates the use of illegitimate force. In section I, I survey the theoretical concerns motivating my inquiry into police authority. Section II develops these moral concerns by analyzing two deleterious effects of the DQI. Then, in section III, I show a proper conception of authority to be essential to balancing the two aforementioned rights and argue that the doctrine breeds excessive use of force because it fails to ensure police legitimacy. I finish by suggesting how we should restrict police immunity.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,394

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-09-23

Downloads
3 (#1,851,180)

6 months
3 (#1,471,455)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Moral conflict and political legitimacy.Thomas Nagel - 1987 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 16 (3):215-240.
Authority, Law and Morality.Joseph Raz - 1985 - The Monist 68 (3):295-324.
Justifying self-defense.Kimberly Kessler Ferzan - 2005 - Law and Philosophy 24 (6):711-749.
The procedural entrapment of mass incarceration.Brady Heiner - 2016 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 42 (6):594-631.

Add more references