Shades of the liar

Journal of Philosophical Logic 2 (3):370 - 386 (1973)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf00129609

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Shades of possibility.John F. Post - 1974 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 3 (1/2):155 - 158.
Deflationary truth and the liar.Keith Simmons - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (5):455-488.
John Buridan on the Liar: a study and reconstruction.Paul Vincent Spade - 1978 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 19 (4):579-590.
Simplism and the liar.John David Stone - 1981 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 10 (4):423 - 451.
The Paradox of the Liar.G. H. Wright - 1983 - In Philosophical Logic: Philosophical Papers. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. pp. 25-33.
The liar paradox.Charles Parsons - 1974 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 3 (4):381 - 412.
Logical Paradoxes.James Cargile - 2002 - In Dale Jacquette (ed.), A Companion to Philosophical Logic. Malden, MA, USA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 103–114.
Priest, the liar, and gödel.Charles S. Chihara - 1984 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 13 (2):117 - 124.
Semantics and the liar paradox.Albert Visser - 1989 - Handbook of Philosophical Logic 4 (1):617--706.
The diagonal argument and the liar.Keith Simmons - 1990 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 19 (3):277 - 303.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
40 (#553,424)

6 months
9 (#454,186)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Propositions, possible languages and the liar's revenge.John F. Post - 1974 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (3):223-234.
The Liar and Theories of Truth.John Hawthorn - 1983 - Dissertation, Mcgill University (Canada)
Reviews. [REVIEW]John F. Post - 1975 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 26 (1):73-81.
Reviews. [REVIEW]Peter Machamer & Stephen Lunsford - 1975 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 26 (1):81-82.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references