Pain: Ethics, Culture, and Informed Consent to Relief

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 24 (4):348-359 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As medical technology becomes more sophisticate the ability to manipulate nature and manage disease forces the dilemma of when can becomes ought. Indeed, most bioethical discourse is framed in terms of balancing the values and interests and the benefits and burdens that inform principled decisions about how, when, and whether interventions should occur. Yet, despite advances in science and technology, one caregiver mandate remains as constant and compelling as it was for the earliest shaman—the relief of pain. Even when cure is impossible, the physician's duty of care includes palliation. Moreover, the centrality of this obligation is both unquestioned and universal, transcending time and cultural boundaries.Although universally acknowledged, pain is a complex phenomenon for both the patient and the caregiver, influenced as much by personal values and cultural traditions as by physiological injury and disease.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Human dignity and the ethics and aesthetics of pain and suffering.Daryl Pullman - 2002 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 23 (1):75-94.
Islam and palliative care.K. A. Choong - 2015 - Global Bioethics 26 (1):28-42.
Pain and the Ethics of Pain Management.Rem B. Edwards - 1984 - Social Science and Medicine 18 (6):515-523.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
108 (#197,762)

6 months
6 (#869,904)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeffrey Blustein
CUNY Graduate Center