Mediation and Its Shadow

Philosophy Today 63 (2):427-445 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Emmanuel Levinas and Theodor Adorno never spoke to one another. Both thinkers were of Jewish ancestry, though their lives would be impacted in distinct ways by the rise of Nazism. With these historical parallels in mind, this paper seeks to place these thinkers in a productive juxtaposition with regard to the status of ethics and politics in either’s work. In particular, I examine the ramifications of philosophical reflection on Auschwitz as a mediating event in post-war European philosophy, reading Levinas’s and Adorno’s theoretical differences as alternate philosophical responses to this momentous event. I argue that Levinas’s thought is ailed by the problem of immediacy, exemplified by his positing ethics as first philosophy and his rejection of the category of totality which, as Adorno highlights, is an important critical tool for an analysis of the form of society which produces Nazism.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,253

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-17

Downloads
38 (#622,493)

6 months
10 (#281,857)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elizabeth Portella
University of Oregon

Citations of this work

The Mending of a Fractured Self. On the Self as a Produced and Sustained Entity.Sterling Hall - 2021 - Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai Philosophia 66 (1):117-138.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references