The ontology of what is not there

Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 91 (1):73-80 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

After discussion of the mainstream definition of ontology, and a short analysis of the Aristotelian's principles, the paper addresses the problem of the categorial nature of the future by distinguishing (a) possibility from potentiality and (b) forward from upward emergence.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,854

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

After the Subject: Meillassoux's Ontology of 'What May Be'.Peter Gratton - 2009 - Pli (20):55-80.
Putnam and ontology, or what is conceptual relativity.Krzysztof Czerniawski - 2008 - Diametros:1-17.
Gene Ontology annotations: What they mean and where they come from.David P. Hill, Barry Smith, Monica S. McAndrews-Hill & Judith A. Blake - 2008 - BMC Bioinformatics 9 (5):1-9.
The New Mechanistic Approach and Cognitive Ontology—Or: What role do (neural) mechanisms play in cognitive ontology?Beate Krickel - 2024 - Minds and Machines 34 (3):1-19.
The Ontology of Facts and Values.Arto Siitonen - 1998 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 64:191-202.
The Unique Ontology of Capital.Robert Albritton - 1998 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 60:55-98.
An Elementary System of Ontology.John T. Kearns - 2006 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 89:87.
Canonical Notation, Predication and Ontology.Paul Gochet - 2000 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 70:207-224.
Facts, Events, Things and the Ontology of Physics.Mauro Dorato - 2000 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 76:343-364.
Do We Need Complex Properties in Our Ontology?Jacek Paśniczek - 2006 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 89:113-128.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
34 (#672,902)

6 months
34 (#113,698)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references