Abstract

The ideas of I. Kant and H. Arendt as to the essence of the aesthetic judgment considering and also its political intentions and attributes are researched. Phenomenon of the aesthetical judgment is considered in the context of the conception of the political and aesthetic spaces interaction. The special attention is paid to the possibility to research the aesthetic judgment as a factor of the political consequence elements forming, the aesthetic effects on the political emotions and judgments. The special problem of the aesthetic conception in the Kantian philosophy is the need to explication of the transcendental ideas of morality in practice. In Kant’s view such explication could be the beautiful objects. But Kant applied to the universal ideas of morality and truth, and this point became the contradictive thinks in political-aesthetic concept of Hanna Arendt. Arendt suppose, that politics itself is the game which can be played by political actors, which play under aesthetical and irrational influence of the concrete political phenomenon or process. And this actors being involved in the political games could not be impartial in their political decisions, but only persons not involved in the political activity in emotional sense could be objective and unprejudiced in their political views and decisions. The main problem of the aesthetical judgment in political view, which follows from the arguments of Kant and Arendt, is the real political problems of the valuation criteria of the aesthetical judgment.