From the "mere thing" to the meaning of the work of art in the philosophy of Arthur Danto

Universitas Philosophica 29 (58):277-308 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Arthur and Andy.Daniel Herwitz - 2021 - In Lydia Goehr & Jonathan Gilmore (eds.), A Companion to Arthur C. Danto. Hoboken: Wiley. pp. 389–396.
Boundaries Crossed.András Szántó - 2021 - In Lydia Goehr & Jonathan Gilmore (eds.), A Companion to Arthur C. Danto. Hoboken: Wiley. pp. 18–25.
Writing with Style.Arturo Fontaine - 2021 - In Lydia Goehr & Jonathan Gilmore (eds.), A Companion to Arthur C. Danto. Hoboken: Wiley. pp. 26–32.
Sartre, Transparency, and Style.Taylor Carman - 2021 - In Lydia Goehr & Jonathan Gilmore (eds.), A Companion to Arthur C. Danto. Hoboken: Wiley. pp. 33–41.
Arthur C. Danto, Andy Warhol. [REVIEW]Andrew Lugg - 2010 - Philosophy in Review 30 (3):180-182.
What Art Is.Arthur C. Danto - 2013 - New Haven: Yale University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-31

Downloads
96 (#220,694)

6 months
14 (#237,383)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

La estructura de las revoluciones científicas.Thomas Kühn - 1992 - Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Rica 40 (101):179-190.

Add more references