Armstrong was a Cheat: A Reply to Eric Moore

Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 14 (2):247-263 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, we reply to Eric Moore’s argument that Lance Armstrong did not cheat, at least according to one, standard account of cheating. If that is the case, we argue, so much the worse for th...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-14

Downloads
58 (#372,249)

6 months
5 (#1,062,008)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Jon Pike
Open University (UK)

References found in this work

Responsibility incorporated.Philip Pettit - 2007 - Ethics 117 (2):171-201.
The Ethos of Games.Fred D'Agostino - 1981 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 8 (1):7-18.
Language Conventions Made Simple.Ruth Garrett Millikan - 1998 - Journal of Philosophy 95 (4):161.

View all 15 references / Add more references