Hypotheses? Forget about it!

Philosophy Now (Jul/Aug):47 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

On the status of hypotheses in science, and why scientists would be better off asking questions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Don’t Blame the Idealizations.Nicholaos Jones - 2013 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 44 (1):85-100.
Confirmation and hypothesis.Lawrence Resnick - 1959 - Philosophy of Science 26 (1):25-30.
Ad Hoc Hypothesis Generation as Enthymeme Resolution.Woosuk Park - 2006 - In Lorenzo Magnani & Claudia Casadio (eds.), Model Based Reasoning in Science and Technology. Logical, Epistemological, and Cognitive Issues. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Scientific Progress: Why Getting Closer to Truth Is Not Enough.Moti Mizrahi - 2017 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 31 (4):415-419.
Kant's Theory of Scientific Hypotheses in its Historical Context.Boris Demarest & Hein van den Berg - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 92:12-19.
The Receptivity of Hypotheses.V. V. Nalimov - 1977 - Diogenes 25 (100):179-197.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-06-07

Downloads
337 (#84,140)

6 months
37 (#110,994)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references