Metastasis as supra-cellular selection? A reply to Lean and Plutynski

Biology and Philosophy 32 (2):281-287 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In response to Germain argument that evolution by natural selection has a limited explanatory power in cancer, Lean and Plutynski have recently argued that many adaptations in cancer only make sense at the tumor level, and that cancer progression mirrors the major evolutionary transitions. While we agree that selection could potentially act at various levels of organization in cancers, we argue that tumor-level selection is unlikely to actually play a relevant role in our understanding of the somatic evolution of human cancers.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-12-09

Downloads
76 (#272,641)

6 months
10 (#379,980)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Lucie Laplane
CNRS, Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne

Citations of this work

Biological functions and natural selection: a reappraisal.Marc Artiga - 2021 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (2):1-22.
Cancer and the Levels of Selection.Samir Okasha - 2024 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 75 (3):537-560.
Going big by going small: Trade-offs in microbiome explanations of cancer.Emily C. Parke & Anya Plutynski - 2023 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 97 (C):101-110.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations