A metaphilosophical dilemma for epistemic externalism

Metaphilosophy 36 (5):688-707 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article I argue that the prevalence of intersubjective disagreement in epistemology poses a serious problem for Epistemic Externalism. I put the problem in the form of a dilemma: either Epistemic Externalism is not a complete account of epistemic justification or it's implausible to claim that the belief that Epistemic Externalism is true is itself an externalistically justified belief.

Categories

Keywords

epistemic justification   Epistemic Externalism   Epistemic Internalism   intersubjective disagreement   epistemic justification   Epistemic Externalism   Epistemic Internalism   intersubjective disagreement   epistemic justification   Epistemic Externalism   Epistemic Internalism   intersubjective disagreement   epistemic justification   Epistemic Externalism   Epistemic Internalism   intersubjective disagreement   epistemic justification   Epistemic Externalism   Epistemic Internalism   intersubjective disagreement   epistemic justification   Epistemic Externalism   Epistemic Internalism   intersubjective disagreement   epistemic justification   Epistemic Externalism   Epistemic Internalism   intersubjective disagreement   epistemic justification   Epistemic Externalism   Epistemic Internalism   intersubjective disagreement   epistemic justification   Epistemic Externalism   Epistemic Internalism   intersubjective disagreement   epistemic justification   Epistemic Externalism   Epistemic Internalism   intersubjective disa

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-9973.2005.00400.x

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Uncorrected proof.Pierre Le Morvan - manuscript
To what extent are content externalism and epistemic internalism compatible?Cristina Amoretti - 2016 - Esercizi Filosofici 11 (2).
Epistemic justification: Internalism vs. Externalism, Foundations vs. Virtues. [REVIEW]Duncan Pritchard - 2004 - Mind 113 (450):319-322.
Active Externalism and Epistemic Internalism.J. Adam Carter & S. Orestis Palermos - 2015 - Erkenntnis 80 (4):753-772.
Epistemic Internalism, Content Externalism and the Subjective/Objective Justification Distinction.J. Adam Carter & S. Orestis Palermos - 2016 - American Philosophical Quarterly 53 (3):231-244.
On the Compatibility of Epistemic Internalism and Content Externalism.B. J. C. Madison - 2009 - Acta Analytica 24 (3):173-183.
Epistemic justification and epistemic luck.Job de Grefte - 2018 - Synthese 195 (9):3821-3836.
Internalism and Externalism.B. J. C. Madison - 2017 - In Sven Bernecker & Kourken Michaelian (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Memory. New York: Routledge. pp. 283-295.
Epistemic Justification: Essays in the Theory of Knowledge.William P. Alston - 1989 - Cornell University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
61 (#348,217)

6 months
9 (#477,108)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophical explanations.Robert Nozick - 1981 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Epistemology and cognition.Alvin I. Goldman - 1986 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Theory of knowledge.Roderick M. Chisholm - 1966 - Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,: Prentice-Hall.

View all 34 references / Add more references