Two Rival Conceptions of Sôphrosunê

Polis 22 (2):249-264 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many commentators still take the Delphic speech in the Charmides as Socrates’ opinion of sôphrosunê. This is a misreading. The speaker is Critias, a future tyrant, and close analysis reveals his conception of self-knowledge, as a godlike and self-certain wisdom, to be perverted by his tyrannical views. His conception of sôphrosunê must be distinguished from Socrates’, and while the former conception is refuted in the dialogue, the latter is not.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-01

Downloads
40 (#565,712)

6 months
11 (#358,218)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Tyranny of Scholarship.David Lawrence Levine - 1984 - Ancient Philosophy 4 (1):65-72.

Add more references