Epistemology and the sociology of knowledge: The contributions of mannheim, mills, and merton [Book Review]

Theory and Society 1 (1):59-88 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Karl Mannhelm and the Soclology of Knowledge.David Kettler & Volker Meja - 2001 - In Barry Smart & George Ritzer (eds.), Handbook of social theory. Thousands Oaks, Calif.: SAGE. pp. 100.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
56 (#387,061)

6 months
14 (#236,708)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Sociology and the linguistic distance: A comment.Beng-Huat Chua - 1978 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 5 (2):174-190.
Paradigms and incommensurability.Derek L. Phillips - 1975 - Theory and Society 2 (1):37-61.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The structure of scientific revolutions.Dudley Shapere - 1964 - Philosophical Review 73 (3):383-394.
Normal science and its dangers.Karl Popper - 1970 - In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press. pp. 51--8.
The Republic of science.Michael Polanyi - 1962 - Minerva 1 (1):54-73.
Consolations for the Specialist.Paul Feyerabend - 1970 - In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press. pp. 197.
Reflections on my Critics1.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1970 - In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press. pp. 231.

View all 9 references / Add more references