Geometric Pooling: A User's Guide

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Much of our information comes to us indirectly, in the form of conclusions others have drawn from evidence they gathered. When we hear these conclusions, how can we modify our own opinions so as to gain the benefit of their evidence? In this paper we study the method known as geometric pooling. We consider two arguments in its favour, raising several objections to one, and proposing an amendment to the other.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-28

Downloads
2,005 (#6,906)

6 months
391 (#4,898)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Richard Pettigrew
University of Bristol
Jonathan Weisberg
University of Toronto, Mississauga

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Support for Geometric Pooling.Jean Baccelli & Rush T. Stewart - 2023 - Review of Symbolic Logic 16 (1):298-337.
Groupthink.Jeffrey Sanford Russell, John Hawthorne & Lara Buchak - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (5):1287-1309.
Two mistakes about credence and chance.Ned Hall - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (1):93 – 111.
Conditionalization, cogency, and cognitive value.Graham Oddie - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (4):533-541.

View all 9 references / Add more references