Stit and the language of agency

Synthese 86 (3):379 - 408 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Stit, a sentence form first introduced in Belnap and Perloff (1988), encourages a modal approach to agency. Von Wright, Chisholm, Kenny, and Castañeda have all attempted modal treatments of agency, while Davidson has rejected such treatments. After a brief explanation of the syntax and semantics of stit and a restatement of several of the important claims of the earlier paper, I discuss the virtues of stit against the background of proposals made by these philososphers.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf00485267

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,854

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

An Investigation in the Logics of Seeing-to-It-That.Ming Xu - 1996 - Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh
Action Types in Stit Semantics.John Horty & Eric Pacuit - 2017 - Review of Symbolic Logic 10 (4):617-637.
Some Forms of Collectively Bringing About or ‘Seeing to it that’.Marek Sergot - 2021 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 50 (2):249-283.
Combinations of Stit with Ought and Know.Ming Xu - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 44 (6):851-877.
Alternative axiomatics and complexity of deliberative stit theories.Philippe Balbiani, Andreas Herzig & Nicolas Troquard - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 37 (4):387 - 406.
Combinations of Stit and Actions.Ming Xu - 2010 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 19 (4):485-503.
Actions and outcomes: two aspects of agency.Beth Huffer - 2007 - Synthese 157 (2):241-265.
A Neutral Temporal Deontic STIT Logic.Kees van Berkel & Tim Lyon - 2019 - In P. Blackburn, E. Lorini & M. Guo (eds.), Logic, Rationality, and Interaction. Springer. pp. 340-354.
Collective agency, direct action and dynamic operators.José Carmo - 2010 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 18 (1):66-98.
Inference as doxastic agency. Part II: Ramifications and refinements.Heinrich Wansing & Grigory K. Olkhovikov - 2017 - Australasian Journal of Logic 14 (4):408-438.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
114 (#189,625)

6 months
8 (#622,456)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Branching space-time.Nuel Belnap - 1992 - Synthese 92 (3):385 - 434.
Can I Only Intend My Own Actions?Luca Ferrero - 2013 - In David Shoemaker (ed.), Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility, Volume 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press UK. pp. (1) 70-94.
The way of the agent.Nuel Belnap & Michael Perloff - 1992 - Studia Logica 51 (3-4):463 - 484.
Axioms for deliberative stit.Ming Xu - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 27 (5):505-552.
Ought and agency.Daniel Skibra - 2022 - Synthese 200 (5):1-40.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Action, Emotion And Will.Anthony Kenny - 1963 - Ny: Humanities Press.
The logical form of action sentences.Donald Davidson - 1966 - In Nicholas Rescher (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action. University of Pittsburgh Press. pp. 81--95.

View all 18 references / Add more references