Reply to professor Hoekstra

Journal of Philosophy 42 (4):101-108 (1945)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

0022362X

DOI

10.2307/2019666

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,337

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Is the work of art a construct? A reply to professor Pepper.Donald F. Henze - 1955 - Journal of Philosophy 52 (16):433-439.
Reply to Stephen Mumford. [REVIEW]Peter Unger - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (2):484-490.
Reply to professor Calkins.Ralph Barton Perry - 1927 - Journal of Philosophy 24 (25):683-685.
Reply to professor Lee.Stuart M. Brown - 1951 - Journal of Philosophy 48 (8):244-247.
Reply to professor Schneider.Edwin E. Aubrey - 1951 - Journal of Philosophy 48 (3):74-77.
Reply to professor Moore.James Bissett Pratt - 1941 - Journal of Philosophy 38 (3):78-80.
Reply to professor Ushenko.Willard V. Quine - 1942 - Journal of Philosophy 39 (3):68-71.
A reply to professor Mandelbaum's note.Richard A. Littman - 1943 - Journal of Philosophy 40 (14):374-377.
The fetishism of democracy: A reply to professor Gould.Allen Buchanan - 1980 - Journal of Philosophy 77 (11):729-731.
Representation and presentation: A reply to professor Dickie.Monroe C. Beardsley - 1961 - Journal of Philosophy 58 (9):238-241.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
49 (#448,188)

6 months
9 (#488,506)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references