Religion after atheism

Religious Studies 49 (2):249-255 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article reflects critically on some of the claims of J. L. Schellenberg's trilogy and on the fundamental decisions lying behind them. Some of the latter are found to be tied to his earlier work on atheism in ways that can be questioned

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,934

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Schellenberg on Propositional Faith.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 2013 - Religious Studies (2):181-194.
Private evidence for atheism.Aaron Bartolome - 2023 - Religious Studies 59 (1):97–114.
Marxism.Peter Thompson - 2013 - In Stephen Bullivant & Michael Ruse (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Atheism. Oxford University Press UK.
Central and Eastern Europe.Irena Borowik, Branko Ančić & Radosław Tyrała - 2013 - In Stephen Bullivant & Michael Ruse (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Atheism. Oxford University Press UK.
Dawkins’ godless delusion.J. Angelo Corlett - 2009 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 65 (3):125-138.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-12

Downloads
43 (#527,210)

6 months
6 (#913,443)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Penelhum
Last affiliation: University of Calgary

Citations of this work

The nature of faith in analytic theistic philosophy of religion.Dan-Johan Eklund - 2016 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 80 (1):85-99.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references