Marxism, Metaethics, and Morality
Dissertation, The University of Arizona (
1985)
Copy
BIBTEX
Abstract
This work first exposits and analyzes Marx's implicit moral theory and then examines various objections to the thesis that Marxism and morality are genuinely compatible. Chapter 2 traces the development of Marx's moral views and argues that his implicit moral theory is based on the values of freedom , human community and self-realization. Chapter 3 argues that Marx's concept of exploitation is, in part, evaluative and involves the violation of the freedom of the exploited due to undemocratic social institutions. In Chapters 4 and 5 I argue that Marx is not a utilitarian nor, strictly speaking, a consequentialist of any sort: he does not demand the maximization of a nonmoral good but, rather, a maximum system of equal freedoms, both positive and negative. Chapter 6 argues that Marx's form of practical reasoning is not purely prudential nor, for any other reason, non-moral in nature and that, in reality, Marx sees moral concerns as well as self-interest as part of revolutionary motivation. Chapter 7 argues against the view that Marx is a "moral historicist," as well as against the thesis that morality is irrelevant from a Marxist point of view because socialism is inevitable. Chapter 8 analyzes the Marxist concept of ideology and argues that once we become clear about both this concept and that of morality, we see that morality is not, as a whole, ideological. Chapter 9 argues that Marxism is not committed to any pernicious form of ethical relativism and then brings to bear hypothetical choice theories and the ideal of unanimous intersubjective agreement. Finally, Chapter 10 takes up Marx's objections to these concepts and argues that they either apply only to certain 'bourgeois' theories or are based on misconceptions and an adequate Marxist moral and social theory must be grounded on theories of justice and human rights