Argumente für und wider das heliozentrische Weltbild

Annals of Science 32 (2):163-167 (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Historians of science have proposed many theories to explain why Copernicus rejected the Ptolemaic system and advanced his own heliocentric system. In support of his new cosmological system Copernicus always employed theoretical considerations and never the existence of discrepancies between the positions given in the Tables and those observed. It is shown that the general acceptance of the heliocentric system through the work of the astronomers resulted not so much from empirical considerations but rather from the fact that this system was suited to a comprehensive, general dynamics

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Erfahrung und Vorurteil im naturwissenschaftlichen Denken Johannes Keplers†.Fritz Krafft - 1991 - Berichte Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 14 (2):73-96.
Reflections on the Scientific Revolution (1543–1687).Owen Gingerich - 2009 - In Melville Y. Stewart (ed.), Science and Religion in Dialogue. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 603--617.
Kepler: Moving the Earth.Ernan McMullin - 2011 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 1 (1):3-22.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
24 (#897,904)

6 months
4 (#1,232,709)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references