God Had to Create the World

Religious Studies 30 (3):331 - 333 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a recent paper T. D. J. Chappell advances the thesis that orthodox Christianity is incompatible with consequentialism. 1 His thesis is grounded on a number of premises; I shall, however, confine my criticism to only one of them, i.e. a consequentialist God could not possibly have created a world. Here is his argument

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,458

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why God Is Not a Consequentialist.T. D. J. Chappell - 1993 - Religious Studies 29 (2):239 - 243.
Infinite Value and the Best of All Possible Worlds.Nevin Climenhaga - 2018 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 97 (2):367-392.
The Argument from Evil: Reply to Professor Richman.Douglas Langston - 1980 - Religious Studies 16 (1):103 - 113.
Divine Unsurpassability.Klaas Kraay - 2007 - Philosophia 35 (3-4):293-300.
God might be responsible for physical evil.Michael Bertrand - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (3):513 – 515.
Trinity and creation: Why Kortum's argument fails.Tom Mccall - 2007 - Heythrop Journal 48 (2):260–266.
God and the Hypothesis of No Prime Worlds.Klaas J. Kraay - 2006 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 59 (1):49-68.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
24 (#911,194)

6 months
7 (#711,641)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The 'why design?' Question.Neil A. Manson - 2008 - In Yujin Nagasawa & Erik Wielenberg (eds.), New waves in philosophy of religion. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 68.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references