A constructive consistency proof of a fragment of set theory

Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 27 (1):25-62 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,458

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Heyting-valued interpretations for Constructive Set Theory.Nicola Gambino - 2006 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 137 (1-3):164-188.
Systems of combinatory logic related to Quine's ‘New Foundations’.M. Randall Holmes - 1991 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 53 (2):103-133.
Generalizing realizability and Heyting models for constructive set theory.Albert Ziegler - 2012 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (2):175-184.
On Feferman’s operational set theory OST.Gerhard Jäger - 2007 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 150 (1-3):19-39.
Large sets in intuitionistic set theory.Harvey Friedman & Andrej Ščedrov - 1984 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 27 (1):1-24.
Inaccessible set axioms may have little consistency strength.L. Crosilla & M. Rathjen - 2002 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 115 (1-3):33-70.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-16

Downloads
23 (#942,055)

6 months
5 (#1,043,573)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations