The Limits of Measurement and of Mathematization in the Social Sciences

der 16. Weltkongress Für Philosophie 2:1018-1025 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The results achieved in the natural sciences due to their mathematisation encouraged many to apply mathematics also in disciplines traditionally regarded as unamenable to mathematical treatment. Various critics consider the use of measurement in such disciplines as unsound. They hold any sentenoe which states relations between sociological or humanistic quantities as only spuriously meaningful. Is this criticism justified? Under what conditions can measurement be fruitfully applied outside the domain of the exact sciences? What does it mean to measure something? These problems are given consideration.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,934

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Some Basic Factors of Mathematization in Science.Karel Berks - 1983 - der 16. Weltkongress Für Philosophie 2:186-193.
Biology Actualizes the New Aspects of the Philosophy of Science.N. Depenchuk - 1983 - der 16. Weltkongress Für Philosophie 2:390-395.
Towards a Darwinian Approach to Mathematics.Helen Cruz - 2006 - Foundations of Science 11 (1):157-196.
Social Measurement: What Stands in its Way?Martin Bulmer - 2001 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 68.
Etiology and the Etiologic Agent.Caroline Whitbeck - 1983 - der 16. Weltkongress Für Philosophie 2:1394-1401.
Measurement Theory.Fred S. Roberts (ed.) - 1985 - Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-11

Downloads
13 (#1,337,552)

6 months
3 (#1,498,028)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references