Sacralisation of contested territory in nationalist discourse: a study of Milošević's and Putin’s public speeches

Critical Discourse Studies 14 (5):497-513 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACTDespite their differences in age, professional career and political background, Milošević and Putin share similar views on one of the main consequences of the disintegration of Yugoslavia and the USSR: the involuntary dispersal of Serbs and Russians into different foreign states. This is a study of the segments of Milošević’s and Putin’s speeches referring to Kosovo and to Crimea respectively. The study analyses their rhetorical devices and thematic content, using the analytical framework and instruments for the analysis of nationalist discourses developed by the Vienna School of Critical Discourse Analysis. The speeches, it is argued here, share a topos of sacralisation of the land based on the ancestors’ holy or glorious deeds which proclaims the land to be sacred to the chosen nation. This creates a ‘national entitlement’ to the land in a depoliticised and highly personalised setting.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,597

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analysing political speeches: rhetoric, discourse and metaphor.Kate Budd - 2014 - Critical Discourse Studies 13 (1):139-141.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-08-01

Downloads
33 (#689,169)

6 months
13 (#265,352)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references