The legitimacy of the military, private military and security companies, and just war theory

European Journal of Political Theory 11 (2):131-154 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The legitimacy of the military is frequently overlooked in standard accounts of jus ad bellum. Accordingly, this paper considers how the military should be organized. It proposes a normative conception of legitimacy – the ‘Moderate Instrumentalist Approach’ – that outlines the qualities that a military should possess. It then assesses the three leading ways of organizing the military according to this approach: the use of private military and security companies (PMSCs), a conscripted force and the all-volunteer force (AVF). The paper argues that the AVF, despite some notable problems, is the most legitimate way of organizing the military

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Just War Theory and the Privatization of Military Force.James Pattison - 2008 - Ethics and International Affairs 22 (2):143–162.
From Hiroshima to Baghdad: Military Hegemony versus Just Military Preparedness.Harry van der Linden - 2010 - In Ėduard Vasilʹevich Demenchonok (ed.), Philosophy after Hiroshima. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press. pp. 203-232.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-20

Downloads
125 (#175,018)

6 months
15 (#211,303)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Pattison
University of Manchester

Citations of this work

Assembling an army: considerations for just war theory.Nathan P. Stout - 2016 - Journal of Global Ethics 12 (2):204-221.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references