In Defence of Jus Ad Bellum Criteria

Philosophia 51 (5):2307-2315 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this contribution, I defend the standard list of jus ad bellum principles. In The Ethics of War and the Force of Law: A Modern Just War Theory, Uwe Steinhoff endorses only three principles of jus ad bellum (right intention, just cause, and proportionality) and claims that the others are redundant. I argue that, although fundamentally all jus ad bellum principles can be reduced to proportionality, in practice it is vital to retain the main jus ad bellum criteria as separate principles.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-02

Downloads
38 (#597,502)

6 months
13 (#267,677)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Reply to Critics.Uwe Steinhoff - 2023 - Philosophia 51 (5):2357-2377.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
Facts and Principles.G. A. Cohen - 2003 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 31 (3):211-245.
The ethics of killing in war.Jeff McMahan - 2004 - Ethics 114 (4):693-733.
Innocence, self-defense and killing in war.Jeff McMahan - 1994 - Journal of Political Philosophy 2 (3):193–221.
The ethics of killing in war.Jeff McMahan - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (1):693-733.

View all 11 references / Add more references