Kartezjańska koncepcja zwierzęcia-maszyny

Filo-Sofija 12 (17):51-64 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ESCARTES’S CONCEPTION OF BEAST-MACHINE According to standard interpretations, Descartes asserted that animals were mere automata and did not feel pain. This interpretation is based on his notion of the beast-machine. In this article, I revise John Cottingham’s sevenfold analysis of that thesis. In Cottingham’s view, Descartes did insist that animals were automata and denied them consciousness and self-consciousness but it did not involve that animals do not feel. I support this view with some new arguments. I also point to the difference between Descartes’s original conception of animal and animality and the standpoint of his followers. Keywords: DESCARTES, CONCEPTION OF BEAST-MACHINE, JOHN COTTINGHAM, ANIMAL, CONSCIOUSNESS, SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Descartes on animals.Peter Harrison - 1992 - Philosophical Quarterly 42 (167):219-227.
Descartes on the Animal Within, and the Animals Without.Evan Thomas - 2020 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50 (8):999-1014.
Descartes and his critics on passions and animals.Evan Thomas - 2022 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 30 (5):773-796.
Descartes and Pascal.Roger Ariew - 2007 - Perspectives on Science 15 (4):397-409.
A Controversy About Animal Consciousness.Lisbeth Ellen Duncan-Lacoste - 2003 - Dissertation, University of Washington

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
40 (#563,866)

6 months
13 (#264,153)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references