Gambling Maxims and their Universalizability

International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (1):17-28 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper explores the moral status of various gambling maxims, particularly as they relate to the bettor’s interest in profit and the mathematical expectation of the game being played. Certain difficulties with the prevailing interpretations of the Formula of Universalizability will also be discussed, particularly in relation to games for which the bettor can have a positive expectation.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Gambling: Some Afterthoughts.Lisa H. Newton - 2003 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (1):29-31.
Nary an Obligatory Maxim from Kant’s Universalizability Tests.Samuel J. M. Kahn - 2022 - Zeitschrift Für Ethik Und Moralphilosophie 5 (1):15-35.
Two Dogmas of Kantian Ethics.Scott Forschler - 2013 - Journal of Value Inquiry 47 (3):255-269.
Gambling and Character.David B. Fletcher - 2003 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (1):1-15.
The Apple of Kant's Ethics: i‐Maxims as the Locus of Assessment.Samuel Kahn - 2022 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 104 (3):559-577.
The Moral Status of the Joshua Tree.Jane Duran - 1999 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 13 (1):113-120.
The trivializability of universalizability.Don Locke - 1968 - Philosophical Review 77 (1):25-44.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
55 (#393,991)

6 months
11 (#352,895)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lawrence Pasternack
Oklahoma State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references