The Moral Epistemological Argument for Atheism

European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7 (1):121--142 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Numerous supposed immoral mandates and commands by God found in religious texts are introduced and discussed. Such passages are used to construct a logical contradiction contention that is called the moral epistemological argument. It is shown how there is a contradiction in that God is omnibenevolent, God can instruct human beings, and God at times provides us with unethical orders and laws. Given the existence of the contradiction, it is argued that an omnibenevolent God does not exist. Finally, this contention is defended from several objections.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Moral Argument For The Non-Existence Of God.Thomas Krettek - 1997 - Philosophy and Theology 10 (2):329-352.
Normative Objections to Atheism.C. Stephen Evans - 2019 - In Graham Oppy (ed.), A Companion to Atheism and Philosophy. Hoboken: Blackwell. pp. 491–505.
Does God Repent?Rik Peels - 2010 - In Jonathan L. Kvanvig (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion Volume. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Encountering Evil: The Evil-god Challenge from Religious Experience.Asha Lancaster-Thomas - 11th July Online - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 12 (3):0-0.
God, the meaning of life, and a new argument for atheism.Jason Megill & Daniel Linford - 2016 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 79 (1):31-47.
The Moral Argument against the Existence of God?Amirhossein Khodaparast - 2018 - پژوهشنامه فلسفه دین 15 (2):23-46.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-03-10

Downloads
1,450 (#11,208)

6 months
211 (#14,319)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John J. Park
California State University, Sacramento

Citations of this work

On an Alleged Proof of Atheism: Reply to John Park.Jerome Gellman - 2015 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7 (3):267--274.

Add more citations