Juridical proof and the best explanation

Law and Philosophy 27 (3):223 - 268 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Book Review. [REVIEW]R. A. Duff - 2010 - Law and Philosophy 29 (2):189-194.
Democracy and restraint.Steven Wall - 2006 - Law and Philosophy 26 (3):307-342.
Forced assistance.Gerhard Øverland - 2009 - Law and Philosophy 28 (2):203 - 232.
The right to do wrong.Gerhard Øverland - 2007 - Law and Philosophy 26 (4):377-404.
Modeling Criminal Law.Ronald J. Allen - 2010 - Law and Philosophy 29 (4):469-481.
Book review. [REVIEW]Susan J. Brison - 2008 - Law and Philosophy 27 (1):97-104.
Emotional excuses.Suzanne Uniacke - 2007 - Law and Philosophy 26 (1):95-117.
Book Review. [REVIEW]Peter S. C. Chau - 2010 - Law and Philosophy 29 (2):231-242.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
129 (#169,751)

6 months
18 (#160,410)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Legal Burdens of Proof and Statistical Evidence.Georgi Gardiner - 2018 - In David Coady & James Chase (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Applied Epistemology. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Varieties of Risk.Philip A. Ebert, Martin Smith & Ian Durbach - 2020 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 101 (2):432-455.
Knowledge, Individualised Evidence and Luck.Dario Mortini - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (12):3791-3815.

View all 33 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The best explanation: Criteria for theory choice.Paul R. Thagard - 1978 - Journal of Philosophy 75 (2):76-92.

Add more references