Embracing Scientific Realism

Cham: Springer (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book provides philosophers of science with new theoretical resources for making their own contributions to the scientific realism debate. Readers will encounter old and new arguments for and against scientific realism. They will also be given useful tips for how to provide influential formulations of scientific realism and antirealism. Finally, they will see how scientific realism relates to scientific progress, scientific understanding, mathematical realism, and scientific practice.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

In defence of scientific realism? [REVIEW]Jan Arreman - 2022 - Metascience 31 (3):365-368.
The Anti-Induction for Scientific Realism.Seungbae Park - 2018 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 95 (3):329-342.
Critiques of Minimal Realism.Seungbae Park - 2017 - Problemos 92:102-114.
Extensional Scientific Realism vs. Intensional Scientific Realism.Seungbae Park - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 59:46-52.
Historical Inductions: New Cherries, Same Old Cherry-picking.Moti Mizrahi - 2015 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 29 (2):129-148.
Scientific Realism.Timothy D. Lyons - 2014 - In Paul Humphreys (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Science. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press. pp. 564-584.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-11-22

Downloads
785 (#30,910)

6 months
173 (#21,671)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Seungbae Park
Ulsan National Institute Of Science And Technology

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references