Bioethics of intervention and the case of drugs Bevacizumab and Ranibizumab for retinal diseases

Revista Iberoamericana de Bioética 2 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

From the year 2000, on a class of biological drugs, the anti-VEGF proved to be quite effective in the treatment of retinal diseases, which have in its pathophysiological mechanism an important vascular proliferation component that can lead to blindness. Two of these drugs, bevacizumab and ranibizumab, are quite similar and have the same efficacy and safety. They were developed by the same laboratory and are commercialized by two major pharmaceutical companies through an agreement made between them. However, there is a big difference in the price of the drugs. The aim of this article is to present the Bioethics of intervention as grounds for choosing the cheaper drug, even if forced to do so by regulatory entities.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

“Go Ask Alice”: The Case for Researching Schedule I Drugs.Kenneth V. Iserson - 2019 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28 (1):168-177.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-23

Downloads
14 (#1,286,464)

6 months
7 (#736,605)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations