Assessment-contextual indexicals

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (1):1 - 17 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I consider whether tenses, temporal indexicals, and other indexicals are contextually dependent on the context of assessment (or a-contextual), rather than, as is usually thought, contextually dependent on the context of utterance (u-contextual). I begin by contrasting two possible linguistic norms, governing our use of context sensitive expressions, especially tenses and temporal indexicals (??2 and 3), and argue that one of these norms would make those expressions u-contextual, while the other would make them a-contextual (?4). I then ask which of these two norms are followed by English speakers (?5). Finally, I argue that the existence of a-contextuality does not in any sense entail ?relativism? about truth (?6)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
114 (#188,249)

6 months
10 (#407,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Josh Parsons
PhD: Australian National University; Last affiliation: University of Otago

References found in this work

Themes From Kaplan.Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.) - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Mimesis as Make-Believe.Kendall Walton - 1996 - Synthese 109 (3):413-434.

View all 14 references / Add more references