Sexual Objectification: From Kant to Contemporary Feminism

Contemporary Political Theory 6 (3):330-348 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Sexual objectification is a common theme in contemporary feminist theory. It has been associated with the work of the anti-pornography feminists Catharine MacKinnon and Andrea Dworkin, and, more recently, with the work of Martha Nussbaum. Interestingly, these feminists' views on objectification have their foundations in the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. Fully comprehending contemporary discussions of sexuality and objectification, therefore, requires a close and careful analysis of Kant's own theory of objectification. In this paper, I provide such an analysis. I explain what is involved, for Kant, in the process of objectification, what it really means for a person to be an object (what Kant calls an `object of appetite'), and finally deal with his reasons for thinking that marriage can provide the solution to the problem of sexual objectification. I then proceed to some contemporary feminist discussions on sexual objectification, showing how influential Kant's ideas have been for contemporary feminist thinkers MacKinnon, Dworkin, and Nussbaum. My analysis of these feminists' work focuses on the striking similarities, as well as the important differences, that exist between their views and Kant's views on what objectification is, how it is caused, and how it can be eliminated

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,074

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is Objectification?Lina Papadaki - 2010 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (1):16-36.
Sexual Objectification.Timo Jütten - 2016 - Ethics 127 (1):27-49.
Mere and Partial Means: The Full Range of the Objectification of Women.Carolyn Mcleod - 2002 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32 (Supplement):219-244.
Sexual Objectification.K. Stock - 2015 - Analysis 75 (2):191-195.
Objectified Women and Fetishized Objects.Paula Keller - 2021 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 19 (1).
The ethics of sexual objectification: Autonomy and consent.Patricia Marino - 2008 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 51 (4):345 – 364.
After Objectification: Locating Harm.Rosa Vince - 2024 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 41 (3):442-462.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-03

Downloads
599 (#46,193)

6 months
42 (#107,548)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Creating the Kingdom of Ends.Christine M. Korsgaard - 1996 - New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Objectification.Martha C. Nussbaum - 1995 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 24 (4):249-291.
Lectures on ethics.Immanuel Kant - 1980 - International Journal of Ethics (1):104-106.
Lectures on Ethics.Immanuel Kant - 1932 - International Journal of Ethics 43 (1):104-106.

View all 14 references / Add more references