Metaphysics over Methodology--Or, Why Infidelity Provides No Grounds To Divorce Causes from Probabilities

Abstract

A reduction of causation to probabilities would be a great achievement, if it were possible.  In this paper I want to defend this reductionist ambition against some recent criticisms from Gurol Irzik (1996) and Dan Hausman (1998). In particular, I want to show that the reductionist programme can be absolved of a vice which is widely thought to disable it--the vice of infidelity

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Reviving Frequentism.Mario Hubert - 2021 - Synthese 199:5255–5584.
Causal reasoning, causal probabilities, and conceptions of causation.Isabelle Drouet - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (4):761-768.
Can We Reduce Causal Direction to Probabilities?David Papineau - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:238-252.
The Reduction of Causal Processes.Mariam Thalos - 2002 - Synthese 131 (1):99-128.
Why, and to what extent, is sexual infidelity wrong?Natasha McKeever - 2020 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 101 (3):515-537.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-26

Downloads
25 (#889,993)

6 months
25 (#127,710)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Papineau
King's College London

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references