The Animals We Eat: Between Attention and Ironic Detachment

Journal of Animal Ethics 12 (1):32-50 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article engages with two fundamental attitudes toward animals who are used for human consumption: attention and ironic detachment. Taken as polarities linked with animal consumption and the refusal thereof, I discuss how these two attitudes are shaped and manifested during moments of encounter with the animals in question. Starting from a striking photograph from the Lychee and Dog Meat Festival in China, I explore the embodiment of these attitudes in the “gaze” of human participants during the encounter with animals who are going to be killed for food.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-08

Downloads
675 (#41,351)

6 months
120 (#48,903)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Silvia Caprioglio Panizza
University College Dublin

References found in this work

Philosophical investigations.Ludwig Wittgenstein & G. E. M. Anscombe - 1953 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 161:124-124.
The animal that therefore I am.Jacques Derrida - 2008 - New York: Fordham University Press. Edited by Marie-Louise Mallet.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan & Mary Midgley - 1986 - The Personalist Forum 2 (1):67-71.
Animal Liberation.Bill Puka & Peter Singer - 1977 - Philosophical Review 86 (4):557.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 1985 - Human Studies 8 (4):389-392.

View all 15 references / Add more references