Type-theoretic interpretation of iterated, strictly positive inductive definitions

Archive for Mathematical Logic 32 (2):75-99 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We interpret intuitionistic theories of (iterated) strictly positive inductive definitions (s.p.-ID i′ s) into Martin-Löf's type theory. The main purpose being to obtain lower bounds of the proof-theoretic strength of type theories furnished with means for transfinite induction (W-type, Aczel's set of iterative sets or recursion on (type) universes). Thes.p.-ID i′ s are essentially the wellknownID i -theories, studied in ordinal analysis of fragments of second order arithmetic, but the set variable in the operator form is restricted to occur only strictly positively. The modelling is done by constructivizing continuity notions for set operators at higher number classes and proving that strictly positive set operators are continuous in this sense. The existence of least fixed points, or more accurately, least sets closed under the operator, then easily follows

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
38 (#597,502)

6 months
10 (#422,339)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Interpreting classical theories in constructive ones.Jeremy Avigad - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (4):1785-1812.
Well-ordering proofs for Martin-Löf type theory.Anton Setzer - 1998 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 92 (2):113-159.
Regular universes and formal spaces.Erik Palmgren - 2006 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 137 (1-3):299-316.
Constructive characterizations of bar subsets.Silvio Valentini - 2007 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 145 (3):368-378.
Predicative functionals and an interpretation of ⌢ID.Jeremy Avigad - 1998 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 92 (1):1-34.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations