Responses to Critics: What Makes Mysticism Critical?

Kantian Review 26 (1):137-162 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

After summarizing the content of my book, Kant and Mysticism, I warn against four preliminary misconceptions. The book never argues that Kant viewed himself as a mystic, fully acknowledges Kant’s negative view of mysticism, offers no comprehensive overview of mystical traditions, and aims to initiate a dialogue, not to have the final word. I then respond to the foregoing essays by the five critics.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-15

Downloads
42 (#567,518)

6 months
8 (#432,306)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen R. Palmquist
Hong Kong Baptist University

Citations of this work

The idea of the end: Kant’s philosophical eschatology.Evan F. Kuehn - 2021 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 82 (1):17-33.

Add more citations