African Philosophy and the Search for an African Philosopher: The Demise of a Conflictual Discourse

Filosofia Theoretica: Journal of African Philosophy, Culture and Religions 4 (1):51-74 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There are contending reasons why the rationale, qualification and justification for becoming an African philosopher are still facing the problem of ontology. One reason, as Didier Kaphagawani posits, is premised on the challenges by anthropology and colonialism. Given Oruka, Makinde, Oladipo, Oke, and Hallen’s perception of these challenges, they concede that these challenges gave birth to the postcolonial search for a distinct African identity. On the one hand, D. A. Masolo’s submission that because “Africa cannot be re -subjectivised; hence, an identity which is peculiarly African is impossible” downplays the concession of Kaphagawani, Oruka, et al. Moreover, there tend s to be agreement among certain philosophers who have devoted their time promoting Africana philosophy and culture-oriented discourse in Africa like Outlaw, Cabral, Fanon, Makinde, Oladipo, Oke, Hallen, Horton, etc., that “the Western discourse on Africa and the response to such discourse” led many African philosophers like Nazombe, Okpewho, Tempels, Nkrumah, Nyerere, Senghor, Cesaire, Awolowo, Mandela, etc., to react using socio-political and academic means to establish a distinct African philosophical paradigm which craves for the re-subjectivisation of Africa. By implication, the response to the Western discourse on Africa, as Outlaw, et al, opine, lend credence to the rationale for the qualification and justification to be an African philosopher; the existence of African philosophy, and the modality of doing philosophy in Africa. Nevertheless, the problem with Outlaw, et al, o n one hand, and D. A. Masolo, on the other, is the failure to recognize that any philosopher need not be of African descent or blood before he can make a meaningful contribution to address the problems facing the development of Africa in all spheres of lif e. This is possible in as much as there is an adequate understanding of the subject under discussion or what it means to do African philosophy. It is this failure or weakness that we shall explore in this essay.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The culture-oriented bias of African philosophical inquiry. da Oyedola - 2014 - Filosofia Theoretica: Journal of African Philosophy, Culture and Religions 3 (2):62-80.
The prefix "African" and its implications for philosophy in Africa.S. T. Segun - 2014 - Filosofia Theoretica: Journal of African Philosophy, Culture and Religions 3 (2):106-123.
The question of the "African" in African philosophy: in search of a criterion for the Africanness of Philosophy.U. O. Uduman - 2014 - Filosofia Theoretica: Journal of African Philosophy, Culture and Religions 3 (1):127-146.
Appiah on race and identity in the illusions of race: A rejoinder.David A. Oyedola - 2015 - Filosofia Theoretica: Journal of African Philosophy, Culture and Religions 4 (2):20-45.
Philosophy in Africa: Challenges of the African Philosopher.Ernest Wamba-dia-Wamba - forthcoming - African Philosophy: The Essential Readings (New York: Paragon House).

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-13

Downloads
12 (#1,367,507)

6 months
7 (#702,633)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?