In defense of a different doppelganger

Philosophical Review 96 (October):521-54 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Must psychology be individualistic?Frances Egan - 1991 - Philosophical Review 100 (April):179-203.
In Defense of a Different Taxonomy: A Reply to Owens.Valerie Walker - 1990 - Philosophical Review 99 (3):425 - 431.
How to Define your (Mental) Terms.Tim Crane - 1998 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 41 (3):341-354.
Folk psychology is here to stay.Terence Horgan & James Woodward - 1985 - Philosophical Review 94 (April):197-225.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
71 (#297,505)

6 months
16 (#192,948)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joseph Owens
University of Minnesota

Citations of this work

Wide Causation.Stephen Yablo - 1997 - Noûs 31 (s11):251-281.
Defending Millian Theories.Bryan Frances - 1998 - Mind 107 (428):703-728.
Externalism, Physicalism, Statues, and Hunks.Bryan Frances - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 133 (2):199-232.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references