Epistemic Akrasia

The Monist 85 (3):381-397 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One way of discerning what sort of control we have over our mental lives is to look at cases where that control is not exercised. This is one reason why philosophers have taken an interest in the phenomenon of akrasia, in an agent's ability to do, freely and deliberately, something that they judge they ought not to do. Akrasia constitutes a failure of control but not an absence of control. The akratic agent is not a compulsive; an akratic agent has the ability to control their action, to make it conform to their judgement, but they fail to exercise that ability. They freely and deliberately give in to temptation

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,290

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Epistemic Akrasia and Treacherous Propositions.Bar Luzon - forthcoming - Philosophical Quarterly.
Epistemic Akrasia.Sophie Horowitz - 2013 - Noûs 48 (4):718-744.
Epistemic Akrasia.Brian Ribeiro - 2011 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 1 (1):18-25.
Epistemic Akrasia and Mental Agency.Cristina Borgoni - 2015 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6 (4):827-842.
Against Epistemic Akrasia.Ioannis Telios - 2024 - Logos and Episteme 15 (1):57-80.
A puzzle about epistemic akrasia.Daniel Greco - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (2):201-219.
Epistemic Akrasia: No Apology Required.David Christensen - 2022 - Noûs 1 (online first):1-22.
Rational Epistemic Akrasia.Allen Coates - 2012 - American Philosophical Quarterly 49 (2):113-24.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
502 (#54,902)

6 months
21 (#136,818)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Owens
King's College London

Citations of this work

A puzzle about epistemic akrasia.Daniel Greco - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (2):201-219.
Rational Epistemic Akrasia.Allen Coates - 2012 - American Philosophical Quarterly 49 (2):113-24.
The rationality of eating disorders.Stephen Gadsby - 2023 - Mind and Language 38 (3):732-749.
A Faithful Response to Disagreement.Lara Buchak - 2021 - The Philosophical Review 130 (2):191-226.
Doxastic Responsibility.Neil Levy - 2007 - Synthese 155 (1):127-155.

View all 49 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

On the aim of belief.David Velleman - 1996 - In J. David Velleman (ed.), The Possibility of Practical Reason. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo). pp. 244--81.
Ethical Consistency.B. A. O. Williams & W. F. Atkinson - 1965 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 39 (1):103-138.
Intention and Weakness of Will.Richard Holton - 1999 - Journal of Philosophy 96 (5):241.

View all 11 references / Add more references