- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Selective Termination of Pregnancy and Women's Reproductive Autonomy
Hastings Center Report 20 (3):6-11 (1990)
Abstract
The “demand” for selective termination of pregnancy is a socially constructed response to prior medical interventions in women's reproductive processes, themselves dependent on cultural views of infertility.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Case Studies: Selective Termination of Pregnancy.Angela R. Holder & Mary Sue Henifin - 1988 - Hastings Center Report 18 (1):21.
Reproductive choice.Rebecca Bennett & John Harris - 2007 - In Rosamond Rhodes, Leslie P. Francis & Anita Silvers (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Medical Ethics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 201–219.
For Dignity or Money: Feminists on the Commodification of Women’s Reproductive Labour.Carolyn McLeod - 2007 - In Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford handbook of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 258-281.
Pushing the boundaries: Uterine transplantation and the limits of reproductive autonomy.Laura O’Donovan - 2018 - Bioethics 32 (8):489-498.
Is Pregnancy Necessary? Feminist Concerns About Ectogenesis.Julien S. Murphy - 1989 - Hypatia 4 (3):66-84.
The Future of Reproductive Autonomy.Josephine Johnston & Rachel L. Zacharias - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (s3):6-11.
Feminist ethical approach to termination of pregnancy.Berat Alp Çevlikli - 2018 - Türkiye Biyoetik Dergisi 4 (4):158-164.
Freezing Eggs and Creating Patients: Moral Risks of Commercialized Fertility.Elizabeth Reis & Samuel Reis-Dennis - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (s3):S41-S45.
Analytics
Added to PP
2012-11-19
Downloads
31 (#727,171)
6 months
10 (#404,653)
2012-11-19
Downloads
31 (#727,171)
6 months
10 (#404,653)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The Voices Missing from the Autonomy Discourse (Are Also the Most Indispensable).Julia D. Gibson - 2019 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 12 (1):77-98.
Pregnant Woman vs. Fetus: A Dilemma for Hospital Ethics Committees.Martha Swartz - 1992 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1 (1):51.
Women and new reproductive technologies.C. Lema, C. Pereira, A. Cambron & C. Susanne - 1997 - Global Bioethics 10 (1-4):129-137.
Gestational Surrogacy and the Health Care Provider: Put Part of the "IVF Genie" Back Into the Bottle.Karen H. Rothenberg - 1990 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 18 (4):345-352.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-559df78dcc-6qn2c uwo