Modernity is a qualitative, not a chronological, category

Abstract

Few thickets are more tangled than that in which the idea of modernity has become enmeshed, few topics less likely to inspire confidence than the question of its relations to the ‘postmodern’. Not least of the problems concerns the character and status of the concept of modernity itself. For it is far from clear that the main figures in recent debates have been writing about, and disputing, the same set of issues when the term has been used. This is of course, in one sense, precisely the point: it is the meaning of ‘modernity’ that is in dispute, and the argument is hardly just terminological. Nonetheless, there remains considerable scope for reflection about what kind of concept ‘modernity’ is, and in particular for a more systematic consideration of the relations between its various uses. What follows is offered as a preliminary contribution to this task.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,458

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Apologetic modernity.Faisal Devji - 2007 - Modern Intellectual History 4 (1):61-76.
Posting Modernity to the Past?John W. Tate - 1999 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1999 (115):79-94.
The Theory of Reflexive Modernization.Ulrich Beck, Wolfgang Bonss & Christoph Lau - 2003 - Theory, Culture and Society 20 (2):1-33.
"meditations" On Modernity.Majid Amini - 2003 - Minerva 7:208-219.
Aura: The aesthetic of redemption?Yvonne Sherratt - 1998 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 24 (1):25-41.
Theology and Deconstruction.Robert Sokolowski - 1998 - Télos 1998 (110):155-166.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-24

Downloads
72 (#292,254)

6 months
18 (#163,977)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?