How Did William James and Josiah Royce Differ in their Philosophical Temperaments and Styles?

Journal of Philosophical Research 26:547-560 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The present article examines the philosophical temperaments of James and Royce, as well as the kind and development of their philosophical styles. After surveying their stances toward the universe, attitudes toward the more, and their openness to other philosophers’ ideas and critiques, this article focuses on the streams of philosophical thought from which James and Royce chose to “drink”-British, German, Asian, and the work of logicians. Some evidence is drawn from their correspondence and places of study. Their philosophical styles, despite many common traits, differed in ageric tone, use of dichotomies, and frequency of reduplicative expressions, here called “double-barreled shotgun expressions.” Clearly, this research constitutes only one piece in the full mosaic of the increasingly studied James-Royce relationship.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
56 (#401,341)

6 months
8 (#390,329)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Reflex action and the pragmatism of Giovanni papini.E. Paul Colella - 2005 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 19 (3):187-215.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references