Responsibility to Protect goes to China: An interpretivist analysis of how China’s coexistence policy made it a Responsibility to Protect insider

Journal of International Political Theory 16 (2):231-248 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article offers an interpretivist analysis of China’s coexistence approach to developing the Responsibility to Protect norm concerning atrocity crimes against civilians. The English school’s con...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,458

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The responsibility for the other and The Responsibility to Protect.Alain Toumayan - 2014 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 40 (3):269-288.
Christianity and the Responsibility to Protect.Luke Glanville - 2012 - Studies in Christian Ethics 25 (3):312-326.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-25

Downloads
22 (#973,937)

6 months
7 (#711,641)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Responsibility to Protect—Five Years On.Alex J. Bellamy - 2010 - Ethics and International Affairs 24 (2):143-169.
Agents versus structures in English School theory: Is co-constitution the answer?Cornelia Navari - 2020 - Journal of International Political Theory 16 (2):249-267.
Interpreting the English school: History, science and philosophy.Mark Bevir & Ian Hall - 2020 - Journal of International Political Theory 16 (2):120-132.

Add more references