“The Facts in the Case of M. Valdemar”: Undead Bodies and Medical Technology

Journal of Medical Humanities 41 (2):229-242 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between medical technology and liminal states of “undeath” as presented in “The Facts in the Case of M. Valdemar” and the real-life case of Jahi McMath, who was maintained on life support for over four years following a diagnosis of brain death. Through this juxtaposition, “Valdemar” comes to function as a modern fable, an uneasy herald of medical technology’s potential to create liminal states between life and death. The ability to transgress these boundaries bears a cost, however: both Valdemar and Jahi McMath lose the autonomy to direct their respective narratives. Yet, their utterances “from beyond the grave” highlight the precarious nature of their position and the ethical concerns therein. Poe’s literary performance of “undeath” therefore serves to caution real-life cases in which life support is used to sustain an individual reported to be brain-dead. Such application of life-sustaining technology complicates the fundamental binary of life/death, allowing its subjects to resist textual closure. Even as Poe’s work represents an imaginative interrogation of the scientific enterprise, this nineteenth-century story holds a mirror to contemporary medical practice, inviting a reconsideration of the ethics, language, and power relations surrounding the fraught relationship between death and medical technology.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,458

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

‘Yes:—no:—I have been sleeping—and now—now—I am dead’: undeath, the body and medicine.Megan Stern - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39 (3):347-354.
Mesmerization with the Lights On: Poe’s “The Facts in the Case of M. Valdemar”.Robert Tindol - 2021 - Text Matters - a Journal of Literature, Theory and Culture 11:353-368.
Death, Brain Death, and Ethics.David Lamb - 1985 - State University of New York Press.
Life and death decision making.Baruch A. Brody - 1988 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Brain Death: Do We Know Enough?Nancy Valko - 2016 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 16 (1):55-59.
The Advance of Technoscience and the Problem of Death Determination.Bas de Boer & Jonne Hoek - 2020 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 24 (3):306-331.
Medical technology: A pandora's box? [REVIEW]Soma Hewa - 1994 - Journal of Medical Humanities 15 (3):171-181.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-09-02

Downloads
15 (#1,236,051)

6 months
5 (#1,047,105)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

“Brain Death,” “Dead,” and Parental Denial.John J. Paris, Brian M. Cummings & M. Patrick Moore - 2014 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 23 (4):371-382.
‘Yes:—no:—I have been sleeping—and now—now—I am dead’: undeath, the body and medicine.Megan Stern - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39 (3):347-354.

Add more references