Why The One Did Not Remain Within Itself

Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 10:234–247 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Why did the omnipotent, omniscient, unsurpassably, and perfectly good being who is necessary in Himself, and having a supremely rational will, contingently create ex nihilo? What motivation could account for such freely undertaken activity, displaying it as neither necessary nor less than fully rational? The chapter considers and criticizes answers recently offered by Mark Johnston and Alex Pruss. It is argued that creation of some contingent reality or other is necessary, and that plausible reflections on the ordered complexity in God’s motivations indicate that the scope of contingency regarding what to create is highly constricted—though not to the point of complete modal collapse. A perfect creator would create either an infinite and richly varied multiverse or an infinitely improving universe realizing a wide array of kinds of goods. Finally, a rebuttal is given to the contention that any element of contingency in a divine choice entails a rational-explanatory deficiency.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,253

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

God's Perfect Will: Remarks on Johnston and O'Connor.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2022 - Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 10:248-254.
To What Extent Must Creatures Return to the One?Caleb Cohoe - 2022 - Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 10:270-278.
Why Did the One Not Remain within Itself?Mark Johnston - 2019 - Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 9:106-164.
Theism and the Scope of Contingency.Timothy O'Connor - 2008 - Oxford Studies in the Philosophy of Religion 1:134-149.
Leibniz's Theories of Contingency.Robert Merrihew Adams - 1994 - In Robert Merrihew Adams, Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist. New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.
The Trinity's Choice.John-Mark L. Miravalle - 2015 - Philosophy and Theology 27 (1):153-169.
The Contingency of Creation and Divine Choice.Fatema Amijee - 2022 - Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 10:289-300.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-07-01

Downloads
19 (#1,120,317)

6 months
14 (#181,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Timothy O'Connor
Indiana University, Bloomington

Citations of this work

Free will.Timothy O'Connor & Christopher Evan Franklin - 2018 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
An Unsurpassable World.Nevin Climenhaga - 2025 - In Justin J. Daeley, Optimism and The Best Possible World. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. pp. 213-236.
Still Another Anti-Molinist Argument.Daniel Rubio - 2024 - TheoLogica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology 8 (2).

Add more citations

References found in this work

Infinite Value and the Best of All Possible Worlds.Nevin Climenhaga - 2018 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 97 (2):367-392.

Add more references