Emulation or Stimulation? On Exemplars in John Stuart Mill and Friedrich Nietzsche

Dissertation, New York University (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This dissertation examines the views of individuality in the work of Mill and Nietzsche and operates on the presupposition that neutrality between different conceptions of the good is the most vital aspect of liberalism. I begin by arguing that Mill's On Liberty offers compelling arguments for neutrality, while his Utilitarianism contradicts this by arguing that there are 'higher' and 'lower' pleasures, and competent judges who will inform us of the difference, and therefore that there are some choices that people ought to be stopped from making. Unlike previous theorists of the contradiction, I seek always to privilege On Liberty over Utilitarianism. In Nietzsche's work, unlike Mill's, I find no contradiction in his position on individuality. ;For Nietzsche, there can be no definition of the individual since any attempt at definition must limit the possibility of an individual becoming who he is. I argue that where Mill ultimately seeks to offer a model of individuality which we ought to emulate, Nietzsche is determined not to offer models for emulation, but rather to present exemplars in the hope that they might stimulate the few people who can create their own "table of values" and thus be individual. ;I then look at some of the critiques that Nietzsche might make of Mill. I argue that he should have admired a quantitative utilitarianism and the celebration of individuality in On Liberty , but that he would have utterly rejected Mill's qualitative utilitarianism. Three surrogates, Alan Ryan, Wendy Donner, and Joseph Raz, are then introduced to defend Mill, but they do not succeed, primarily because in looking to utilitarian justifications for individuality they end up rejecting his liberty principle. ;Despite the anti-liberal nature of much of Nietzsche's thought, I argue that he is far more liberal than Mill where liberalism is defined as a political theory which favors neutrality between different conceptions of the good, and I conclude with some preliminary remarks on the institutional ramifications of a Nietzschean liberalism

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mill on Individuality.Wendy Donner - 2016 - In Christopher Macleod & Dale E. Miller (eds.), A Companion to Mill. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. pp. 425–439.
Mill and Modern Liberalism.Piers Norris Turner - 2016 - In Christopher Macleod & Dale E. Miller (eds.), A Companion to Mill. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. pp. 567–582.
Was Mill a liberal?C. L. Ten - 2004 - New York: Marshall Cavendish Academic.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references