- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Postscript: Still in search of a good theory of reasoning--Rejoinder to Barrouillet, Gauffroy, and Lecas (2008)
Psychological Review 115 (3):778-778 (2008)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
What must a psychological theory of reasoning explain? Comment on Barrouillet, Gauffroy, and Lecas (2008).Klaus Oberauer & Mike Oaksford - 2008 - Psychological Review 115 (3):773-778.
Postscript: Rejoinder to Johnson et al. (2008) and Birnbaum (2008).Eduard Brandstätter, Gerd Gigerenzer & Ralph Hertwig - 2008 - Psychological Review 115 (1):289-290.
Postscript: Rejoinder to Brandstätter et al. (2008).Michael Birnbaum - 2008 - Psychological Review 115 (1):260-262.
Postscript: Rejoinder to Brandstätter, Gigerenzer, and Hertwig (2008).Eric J. Johnson, Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck & Martijn C. Willemsen - 2008 - Psychological Review 115 (1):272-273.
Postscript: A good psychological theory of reasoning must predict behavior and explain the data.Pierre Barrouillet, Caroline Gauffroy & Jean-François Lecas - 2008 - Psychological Review 115 (3):771-772.
Illusions and models: a reply to Barrouillet and Lecas.P. N. Johnson-Laird - 2000 - Cognition 76 (2):175-178.
Postscript: Rejoinder to McKoon and Ratcliff (2005).Ken McRae, Mary Hare & Michael K. Tanenhaus - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (4):1031-1031.
Replies to Mercier and Oaksford.Howard Darmstadter - 2013 - Thinking and Reasoning 19 (3-4):500-504.
Postscript: Deviations from the predictions of serial search.James S. Adelman & Gordon D. A. Brown - 2008 - Psychological Review 115 (1):228-229.
Nick Chater and Mike Oaksford, eds. The Probabilistic Mind: Prospects for Bayesian Cognitive Science Reviewed by.Anton Petrenko - 2010 - Philosophy in Review 30 (1):16-19.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-06-30
Downloads
16 (#1,189,266)
6 months
10 (#402,856)
2016-06-30
Downloads
16 (#1,189,266)
6 months
10 (#402,856)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-559df78dcc-6qn2c uwo